Image via Wikipedia
Whew! Thank god Time Warner got the message and bowed to consumer desires like they swore they did. Am I the only one who sees this as a 3 year old's tantrum? "Fine then! I'll just turn it off completely! I'll show you who's boss!"
*sigh* Seriously, why don't they get that this is untenable? If you couldn't deliver unlimited transfers at the rate you promised, why did you sell it that way, Time Warner? It's because you couldn't have sold it any other way, right? Consider what that means before you decide to play "screw the consumer" again.
Just go jack your standard cable rates to make up for the loss in bandwidth; after all that's the part of the market you've got a government supported monopoly on in your markets, right? AND it's the piece of the business you're seeing decline, right? Charge the folks that still want it for the folks that have moved on... Hell, why don't all of you cable people lobby for some bailout-- I mean stimulus money? You could claim that the government subsidizing unlimited bandwidth is a good way to boost the economy. It's a great scam, right?!
Funny thing is, it really would be a stimulus, wouldn't it? Maybe all you really need to do is stop panicking and start paying attention to what your consumers want and what they're willing to pay... It's amazing how that works for some folks.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I don't want to get close to the 250gb cap Comcast has, so I'm gonna go browse the web on my G1 now.